Persistent Virtual Desktop
Advantages
- User Connects to the Same Virtual Desktop whenever they connect
- The administrator can install specific applications on a single Persistent Virtual Desktop to meet the unique requirements of a particular user
- Additional Processor, Memory and Storage Resources can easily be assigned to specific Virtual Desktops as needed
- Microsoft 365 Licensing does not require Shared Computer Activation
- Third Party software licensing should follow the standard model as each user is assigned a unique Virtual Desktop
Disadvantages
- Persistent Virtual Desktops require considerably more storage space, this is because each Virtual Desktop has its own unique VHDX rather than a single master image
- Patching is similar to physical devices in that each Persistent Virtual Desktop is a unique self contained entity
Non-Persistent Desktop
Advantages
- Reduced storage space requirements as Non-Persistent Desktops use a master image
- Patching is easy as only the master image needs to be updated
- Users cannot install software or change the configuration which improves overall security
Disadvantages
- Not flexible for users with unique software requirements, some users may not fall neatly into a department category
- Customising the Desktop environment can be more complex and may require App Layering
- Microsoft 365 Licensing with Shared Computer Activation is required
- Third Party software licensing may be more complex or expensive depending upon the licensing model